EdenteV2, Main, Exploration, bibRecord, 004560

Prosthetic outcome of cement‐retained implant‐supported fixed dental restorations: a systematic review

Identifieur interne : 004560 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 004559; suivant : 004561

Prosthetic outcome of cement‐retained implant‐supported fixed dental restorations: a systematic review

Auteurs : M. S. Chaar [Allemagne] ; W. Att [Allemagne] ; J. R. Strub [Allemagne]

Source :

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation [ 0305-182X ] ; 2011-09.

RBID : ISTEX:AAA4FFD6FE89955CBB3075B484486FA6F6C60D76

Descripteurs français

Wicri :
- topic : Ciment, Titane.

English descriptors

Abstract

Summary The aim of the article is to assess the current literature in terms of the prosthetic outcome of cement‐retained implant‐supported fixed restorations, as well as to determine the type of cement that can be recommended for clinical application. A review of the literature published up to May 2010 was conducted to identify clinical studies about cement‐retained implant‐supported fixed restorations. The search strategy applied was a combination of MeSH terms and free text words, including the following keywords: implants, implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs), bridges, implant‐supported single crowns (SCs), cement‐retained, cement fixation, cement, cementation, cement failure, retention, and loss of retention, technical complications, mechanical complications, prosthetic complication, retrievability and maintenance. Thirty‐two studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies were divided into two categories: 15 short‐term clinical studies with an observation period of less than 5 years, and 17 long‐term clinical studies with an observation period of 5 years and more. The most common technical complications of cement‐retained implant‐supported fixed restorations were loss of retention, chipping and abutment screw loosening. The results of the current review revealed no guidelines about cement or cementation procedures. It may be stated that despite the questionable retrievability of cement‐retained implant‐supported fixed restorations, this treatment modality is a reliable and effective option, especially for implant‐supported SCs and short‐span FDPs. The literature does not provide accurate information about the clinical outcome of cement‐retained implant‐supported fixed restorations nor about the ideal type of cement that facilitates stability and maintains retrievability. Standardised randomised clinical trials will provide valuable information to this issue.

Url:

https://api.istex.fr/document/AAA4FFD6FE89955CBB3075B484486FA6F6C60D76/fulltext/pdf

DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02209.x

Affiliations:

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 005521
to stream Istex, to step Curation: 005521
to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 001504
to stream Main, to step Merge: 004588
to stream Main, to step Curation: 004560

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Prosthetic outcome of cement‐retained implant‐supported fixed dental restorations: a systematic review</title>
<author><name sortKey="Chaar, M S" sort="Chaar, M S" uniqKey="Chaar M" first="M. S." last="Chaar">M. S. Chaar</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Att, W" sort="Att, W" uniqKey="Att W" first="W." last="Att">W. Att</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Strub, J R" sort="Strub, J R" uniqKey="Strub J" first="J. R." last="Strub">J. R. Strub</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:AAA4FFD6FE89955CBB3075B484486FA6F6C60D76</idno>
<date when="2011" year="2011">2011</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02209.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/AAA4FFD6FE89955CBB3075B484486FA6F6C60D76/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">005521</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">005521</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">005521</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">001504</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">001504</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0305-182X:2011:Chaar M:prosthetic:outcome:of</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">004588</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">004560</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">004560</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Prosthetic outcome of cement‐retained implant‐supported fixed dental restorations: a systematic review</title>
<author><name sortKey="Chaar, M S" sort="Chaar, M S" uniqKey="Chaar M" first="M. S." last="Chaar">M. S. Chaar</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Albert‐Ludwigs University, Freiburg</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName><region type="land" nuts="1">Bade-Wurtemberg</region>
<region type="district" nuts="2">District de Fribourg-en-Brisgau</region>
<settlement type="city">Fribourg-en-Brisgau</settlement>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Att, W" sort="Att, W" uniqKey="Att W" first="W." last="Att">W. Att</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Albert‐Ludwigs University, Freiburg</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName><region type="land" nuts="1">Bade-Wurtemberg</region>
<region type="district" nuts="2">District de Fribourg-en-Brisgau</region>
<settlement type="city">Fribourg-en-Brisgau</settlement>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Strub, J R" sort="Strub, J R" uniqKey="Strub J" first="J. R." last="Strub">J. R. Strub</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Albert‐Ludwigs University, Freiburg</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName><region type="land" nuts="1">Bade-Wurtemberg</region>
<region type="district" nuts="2">District de Fribourg-en-Brisgau</region>
<settlement type="city">Fribourg-en-Brisgau</settlement>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">38</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">9</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="697">697</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="711">711</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">15</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2011-09">2011-09</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term>
<term>Abutment screw</term>
<term>Andersson</term>
<term>Astra</term>
<term>Astra astra tech</term>
<term>Biocare</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Branemark</term>
<term>Branemark nobel biocare</term>
<term>Cantilever</term>
<term>Cantilever fdps</term>
<term>Cement</term>
<term>Cementation</term>
<term>Cementation procedures</term>
<term>Clin</term>
<term>Clin implant dent relat</term>
<term>Clin periodontol</term>
<term>Clinical application</term>
<term>Clinical outcome</term>
<term>Clinical studies</term>
<term>Complication</term>
<term>Complication rates</term>
<term>Cumulative implant success rate</term>
<term>Current literature</term>
<term>Current review</term>
<term>Customised</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dental implants</term>
<term>Dental prostheses</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Edentulous</term>
<term>Edentulous jaws</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>External connection</term>
<term>Fdps</term>
<term>Fdps loss</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant prosthodontics</term>
<term>Implant restorations</term>
<term>Implant system</term>
<term>Inclusion criteria</term>
<term>Internal connection</term>
<term>International journal</term>
<term>Mangano</term>
<term>Maxillofac</term>
<term>Mechanical complications</term>
<term>Multicenter</term>
<term>Multicenter retrospective analysis</term>
<term>Multicenter study</term>
<term>Nobel biocare</term>
<term>Observation period</term>
<term>Observation periods</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Osseointegrated</term>
<term>Osseointegrated implants</term>
<term>Other complications</term>
<term>Partial dentures</term>
<term>Partial edentulism</term>
<term>Permanent cements</term>
<term>Polycarboxylate cement</term>
<term>Private practice</term>
<term>Prospective multicenter study</term>
<term>Prospective study</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthet</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthetic</term>
<term>Prosthetic complication rate</term>
<term>Prosthetic complications</term>
<term>Prosthetic outcome</term>
<term>Prosthetic success rate</term>
<term>Prosthodont</term>
<term>Prosthodontics</term>
<term>Randomised</term>
<term>Recent study data</term>
<term>Resin cement</term>
<term>Restoration</term>
<term>Retrievability</term>
<term>Retrospective</term>
<term>Retrospective study</term>
<term>Review articles</term>
<term>Review process</term>
<term>Search strategy</term>
<term>Second phase</term>
<term>Shortterm studies</term>
<term>Single crowns</term>
<term>Straumann</term>
<term>Such restorations</term>
<term>Systematic review</term>
<term>Technical complications</term>
<term>Temporary cements</term>
<term>Titanium</term>
<term>Titanium abutments</term>
<term>Treatment modality</term>
<term>Veneering porcelain</term>
<term>Zinc oxide eugenol cement</term>
<term>Zinc phosphate cement</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Abutment</term>
<term>Abutment screw</term>
<term>Andersson</term>
<term>Astra</term>
<term>Astra astra tech</term>
<term>Biocare</term>
<term>Blackwell publishing</term>
<term>Branemark</term>
<term>Branemark nobel biocare</term>
<term>Cantilever</term>
<term>Cantilever fdps</term>
<term>Cement</term>
<term>Cementation</term>
<term>Cementation procedures</term>
<term>Clin</term>
<term>Clin implant dent relat</term>
<term>Clin periodontol</term>
<term>Clinical application</term>
<term>Clinical outcome</term>
<term>Clinical studies</term>
<term>Complication</term>
<term>Complication rates</term>
<term>Cumulative implant success rate</term>
<term>Current literature</term>
<term>Current review</term>
<term>Customised</term>
<term>Dent</term>
<term>Dental implants</term>
<term>Dental prostheses</term>
<term>Dentistry</term>
<term>Denture</term>
<term>Edentulous</term>
<term>Edentulous jaws</term>
<term>Edentulous patients</term>
<term>External connection</term>
<term>Fdps</term>
<term>Fdps loss</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Implant prosthodontics</term>
<term>Implant restorations</term>
<term>Implant system</term>
<term>Inclusion criteria</term>
<term>Internal connection</term>
<term>International journal</term>
<term>Mangano</term>
<term>Maxillofac</term>
<term>Mechanical complications</term>
<term>Multicenter</term>
<term>Multicenter retrospective analysis</term>
<term>Multicenter study</term>
<term>Nobel biocare</term>
<term>Observation period</term>
<term>Observation periods</term>
<term>Oral maxillofac implants</term>
<term>Osseointegrated</term>
<term>Osseointegrated implants</term>
<term>Other complications</term>
<term>Partial dentures</term>
<term>Partial edentulism</term>
<term>Permanent cements</term>
<term>Polycarboxylate cement</term>
<term>Private practice</term>
<term>Prospective multicenter study</term>
<term>Prospective study</term>
<term>Prosthesis</term>
<term>Prosthet</term>
<term>Prosthet dent</term>
<term>Prosthetic</term>
<term>Prosthetic complication rate</term>
<term>Prosthetic complications</term>
<term>Prosthetic outcome</term>
<term>Prosthetic success rate</term>
<term>Prosthodont</term>
<term>Prosthodontics</term>
<term>Randomised</term>
<term>Recent study data</term>
<term>Resin cement</term>
<term>Restoration</term>
<term>Retrievability</term>
<term>Retrospective</term>
<term>Retrospective study</term>
<term>Review articles</term>
<term>Review process</term>
<term>Search strategy</term>
<term>Second phase</term>
<term>Shortterm studies</term>
<term>Single crowns</term>
<term>Straumann</term>
<term>Such restorations</term>
<term>Systematic review</term>
<term>Technical complications</term>
<term>Temporary cements</term>
<term>Titanium</term>
<term>Titanium abutments</term>
<term>Treatment modality</term>
<term>Veneering porcelain</term>
<term>Zinc oxide eugenol cement</term>
<term>Zinc phosphate cement</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Ciment</term>
<term>Titane</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract">Summary  The aim of the article is to assess the current literature in terms of the prosthetic outcome of cement‐retained implant‐supported fixed restorations, as well as to determine the type of cement that can be recommended for clinical application. A review of the literature published up to May 2010 was conducted to identify clinical studies about cement‐retained implant‐supported fixed restorations. The search strategy applied was a combination of MeSH terms and free text words, including the following keywords: implants, implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs), bridges, implant‐supported single crowns (SCs), cement‐retained, cement fixation, cement, cementation, cement failure, retention, and loss of retention, technical complications, mechanical complications, prosthetic complication, retrievability and maintenance. Thirty‐two studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies were divided into two categories: 15 short‐term clinical studies with an observation period of less than 5 years, and 17 long‐term clinical studies with an observation period of 5 years and more. The most common technical complications of cement‐retained implant‐supported fixed restorations were loss of retention, chipping and abutment screw loosening. The results of the current review revealed no guidelines about cement or cementation procedures. It may be stated that despite the questionable retrievability of cement‐retained implant‐supported fixed restorations, this treatment modality is a reliable and effective option, especially for implant‐supported SCs and short‐span FDPs. The literature does not provide accurate information about the clinical outcome of cement‐retained implant‐supported fixed restorations nor about the ideal type of cement that facilitates stability and maintains retrievability. Standardised randomised clinical trials will provide valuable information to this issue.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations><list><country><li>Allemagne</li>
</country>
<region><li>Bade-Wurtemberg</li>
<li>District de Fribourg-en-Brisgau</li>
</region>
<settlement><li>Fribourg-en-Brisgau</li>
</settlement>
</list>
<tree><country name="Allemagne"><region name="Bade-Wurtemberg"><name sortKey="Chaar, M S" sort="Chaar, M S" uniqKey="Chaar M" first="M. S." last="Chaar">M. S. Chaar</name>
</region>
<name sortKey="Att, W" sort="Att, W" uniqKey="Att W" first="W." last="Att">W. Att</name>
<name sortKey="Strub, J R" sort="Strub, J R" uniqKey="Strub J" first="J. R." last="Strub">J. R. Strub</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004560 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 004560 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:AAA4FFD6FE89955CBB3075B484486FA6F6C60D76
   |texte=   Prosthetic outcome of cement‐retained implant‐supported fixed dental restorations: a systematic review
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022

	Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Prosthetic outcome of cement‐retained implant‐supported fixed dental restorations: a systematic review

Prosthetic outcome of cement‐retained implant‐supported fixed dental restorations: a systematic review

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri